Tuesday, June 7, 2011

youtube icon png

youtube icon png. Icons You Tube Folder
  • Icons You Tube Folder


  • sangeethak31
    07-14 08:53 PM
    Thanks for the quick response...

    Could someone please provide me the co-affidavit letter template.

    Thanks,
    Sangeetha K




    youtube icon png. Dribbble - Youtube icon/logo
  • Dribbble - Youtube icon/logo


  • jonty_11
    01-16 04:43 PM
    Yes , I am planning to take the test too......




    youtube icon png. bugbytes updates:
  • bugbytes updates:


  • GC20??
    08-12 03:26 PM
    As my priority date is current I contacted my local congressman's office for help with my I-485. NSC replied back to the office (see reply below) saying my background checks are still on. But the officer at the infopass appointment said my backgrounds checks are complete. I don't know whom to believe.

    Is this some kind of standard reply that USCIS is giving for Congressman's or Senators case status inquiry?

    Good morning XXXXXXXXXXX,
    Re: I-485s <Applicant Name>

    I have conversed with those in charge of these cases.
    The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is
    committed to adjudicating immigration benefits in a timely, efficient
    manner that ensures public safety and national security.

    Toward that end, USCIS requires extensive background checks for every
    application or petition it adjudicates. While background checks for
    most applications or petitions are completed quickly, a small percentage
    of cases involve unresolved background check issues that result in
    adjudication delays.

    Background checks involve more than just the initial submission of and
    response related to biographical information and fingerprints. When
    checks and/or a review of an administrative record reveal an issue
    potentially impacting an applicant's eligibility for the requested
    immigration benefit, further inquiry is needed. The inquiry may include
    an additional interview and/or the need to contact another agency for
    updates or more comprehensive information. If it is determined that an
    outside agency possesses relevant information about a case, USCIS
    requests such information for review. Upon gathering and assessing all
    available information, USCIS then adjudicates the application as
    expeditiously as possible.

    We have checked into your constituent's case and have been assured that
    the agency is aware of your inquiry, and is monitoring progress related
    to it. However, unresolved issues in your constituent's case require
    thorough review before a decision can be rendered. Unfortunately, we
    cannot speculate as to when this review process will be completed.


    We realize that your constituent may feel frustrated by delays related
    to his or her case. As an agency, we must weigh individual
    inconvenience against the broader concerns of public safety and national
    security.

    We hope this information and assurance are helpful. If we may be of
    assistance in the future, please let us know.

    I hope this information is helpful to you. At this time I am closing the
    inquiry on this matter.

    Thank you,

    <Officer Name>

    Immigration Services Officer

    NSC Congressional Unit




    youtube icon png. youtube icon png. events icon png. youtube icons
  • youtube icon png. events icon png. youtube icons


  • nousername
    04-07 01:48 PM
    Thanks for a quick explanation.. So basically we are hosed if we leave our employer on a bad note and he decides to use our labor for someone else.

    Follow up questions:

    1. If I understand this correctly then simply revoking the labor won't kill the I-485 application but the employer needs to substitute the original application for another employee.

    2. Also, by pre-July 2007 you mean people who filed their labor or I-485 before July 2007, or both?

    3. Will this affect people who applied (and approved) for their labor before July'07 but filed their I-485 during / after July'07 fiasco i.e. majority of IV members.

    4. If people in point # 3 are not affected then are they off the leash?

    Thanks.




    In very basic terms.

    If you have left your employer after filing AC21(140 approved and 485 pending for 180 days), your employer then revoked your 140 and used the original labor to file 140 for another person(substitution). Another person has applied for 485.

    Then original applicant's 485 will be denied.....because AAO is saying One Labor can be used only for one Green Card....

    Mind you this is all relates to pre July 2007.



    more...

    youtube icon png. CUAUV#39;s RSS feed
  • CUAUV#39;s RSS feed


  • nixstor
    06-28 02:13 PM
    I am not sure if I am reading this right or not, go this page

    http://www.imminfo.com/resources/cis-sop-aos/3-7.html

    and read the first para. It says G-325A has to be processed only if the applicant has entered the US in non immigrant status less than one year prior to current calendar date of review.

    So any one who has entered US before (07/02/07) will have their G-325A trashed? I was under the impression that USCIS does use the biographic information to check with local law enforcement for the the past 5 years as stated in the G-325A. Any ideas?




    youtube icon png. youtube icon png. youtube Facebook+icon+png+; youtube Facebook+icon+png+. Huntn. Sep 2, 03:51 PM. Can I remind you that internal guide
  • youtube icon png. youtube Facebook+icon+png+; youtube Facebook+icon+png+. Huntn. Sep 2, 03:51 PM. Can I remind you that internal guide


  • Tshelar
    01-02 02:11 PM
    The consulate usually do need more info if you work for Pharmaceucatical or Biotech company. I work for a Pharmaecutical company and when I had gone for my Visa interview they were very specific to ask me if my work deals in any kind of research in chemicals etc. Since I work in the IT department and has nothing to do with reasearch they did not ask for any more info.
    I think your wife should be fine if she furnishes the info that they need.



    more...

    youtube icon png. YouTube Folder v1 Icon
  • YouTube Folder v1 Icon


  • gbof
    09-30 04:08 PM
    I liked the tone and tenor of aila. What surprises me the most is there is NO work audit at uscis and they feel all powerful to scare/ trouble at their whim...

    I got a RFE asking for I-612 approval from uscis. This was not at all required as the same was attached with I-485 filing. Moreover, without this approval H1B could not be filed and subsequently extended.





    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvg_gGkz00d1sudP2jH2iJuunTy6CutIBPDq-3lhoXVTA97zzZ9x7UnBxOkLofbo8aOW2IY7HXMC4qTFCqPaeA08nYQ9lpTq1dYFWeaIGU4rcT_Jm6lMkm63XUouWEDHgL-hPafL2V7ZY/s320/RFE+FROM+HELL.JPG (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvg_gGkz00d1sudP2jH2iJuunTy6CutIBPDq-3lhoXVTA97zzZ9x7UnBxOkLofbo8aOW2IY7HXMC4qTFCqPaeA08nYQ9lpTq1dYFWeaIGU4rcT_Jm6lMkm63XUouWEDHgL-hPafL2V7ZY/s1600-h/RFE+FROM+HELL.JPG)
    Dear Director Mayorkas:

    Last week in a speech you broached the subject of the possible need to increase filing fees because of a decrease in the number of applications received by USCIS this fiscal year. You also noted that there was over $100 million shortfall in your budget because of these decreased filings. I have some suggestions to meet your budget.

    First, look at your budget projections from this last year. Last October, who didn't see the recession? Why weren't reductions in force made at that time? On April 1 when only 33% of the H-1B applications were filed as compared to the year before, why didn't USCIS staff get pared down? A monumental increase in naturalization applications occurred before the Presidential elections (as they do every 4 years), who did not not see a decrease in naturalization applications for 2009! My heck, every business in America was laying off employees, but not USCIS!

    Second, have a heart to heart talk with anyone who issues an RFE that requires more than 5 pages to respond to. This last week we submitted a 3,000 page (30 lb.) response to an RFE (see the picture above), which alleged that an Accountant was not a professional position! Director, what is the deal with your Service Centers? Is there simply too little to do and too many employees? The "service" we are receiving as your customers is not doing the American Economy any good.

    Third, why are the local adjudications officers interviewing non-current priority date visa applicants, including on Saturdays in September! You are paying OVERTIME to examiners to interview people who cannot be approved for their green cards. What sense does that make?


    I have many other ideas as well if you would like to chat. The bottom line is this. The agency you have just taken over is in serious need of a top to bottom review. You have a monstrous challenge ahead of you to bring this agency in line with the priorities it should have. Priorities that not only include national security, but also ensuring our own economic well being and competitiveness by promoting job growth and allowing companies to hire qualified workers, keeping families together through reunification, and bringing new citizens into the fold.


    You need to get control of service centers, where officers are issuing, at increasingly frequent rates, Requests for Evidence that are not only unnecessary, but which are onerous and burdensome, and appear to be designed to make the employer give up his request for the visa application. You have local offices finding marriage "fraud" where no such fraud exists. You have CIS doing 25,000 random walk ins of legitimate U.S. employers of H-1B workers, disrupting the workplace asking questions about the H-1B employer, without regard to a lawyers appearance in the case in clear violation of the 6th Amendment. The list could go on about what your agency is doing wrong. And, while there are things USCIS does right, the reality is that rather than serving immigrants and their employers, you are punishing them.


    So, before you raise your fees, I think you MUST first get your own house in order. You should not and cannot honestly balance your budgetary disaster on the backs of the employers and immigrants you are committed to serving.



    With all sincerity, I wish you the best of luck in your new position.






    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-2662713464097056944?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/rfe-hell-and-increased-uscis-filing.html)




    youtube icon png. icon.png 57×57
  • icon.png 57×57


  • bkarnik
    04-20 05:29 PM
    I called the CBP office at the nearest international airport and the officer said "As long as they leave the country with in 6 months they are good. I don't have to come to the airport to get it corrected". He did not ask me the I-94 numbers or any thing. He just confirmed they are here on class B2.

    So what does the gurus suggest?

    When it comes to immigration matters, my mantra is safe than sorry. I would still make the trip to the CBP office and get a date noted on the I-94. This way if you want to extend their stay, etc you will be covered.



    more...

    youtube icon png. PNG File:
  • PNG File:


  • talash
    04-25 03:19 PM
    I 140 denied.please help to start new thread.Please




    youtube icon png. Imagesto image,youtube icon
  • Imagesto image,youtube icon


  • ebizash
    06-20 01:53 PM
    My LC was filed as Database developer. After about 200 days of I-485, I switched job as Manager. I sent the job description to my attorney and they said I could switch as the job in same or similar "SOC Code". They also said that there is no need to let USCIS know about the change as it is optional. If USCIS issues a RFE, we will respond appropriately.

    The only thing I ensured and you should ensure too is to keep all paperwork in a safe and readily accessible place. You should keep pay stubs from old company as well as new one, job description and offer letter from both employers, and a document detailing circumstances of your job change (such as you changed job because you were afraid that due to market conditions, the company may go out of business or your dept may get outsourced etc etc...)

    P.S. - The attorney is a very renowned attorney and my old and current employers both are Fortune 50 companies.

    PM me if you have any question....



    more...

    youtube icon png. New Youtube Icon (Sketch)
  • New Youtube Icon (Sketch)


  • cox
    June 6th, 2005, 09:58 PM
    I found a photo from cox on this forum that has a similar light condition.

    <Blush> Thanks, Kevin. Skagitswimmer, I often can't use Kevin's technique of getting close, since I am shooting animals most of the time, and they run/fly/swim away. I do something similar though.

    If you use the center spot metering mode (the single dot on Canon products), and then pick a subject that is close to you and has a similar albedo (reflectivity/color) as your intended target, you can get a sanity check on exposure. Then take the meter of the real subject, making sure you're not too far off. Then shoot. Then bracket it, a stop up, shoot, and a stop down, shoot. If you're shooting RAW, this will give you enough coverage, and you WILL get the shot since you can adjust exposure again in PS or DPP or whatever you use.

    You can get about six stops of range in three frames for a few clicks of a wheel, and that ain't bad. If you're using aperture priority (as I usually am to control DoF) or shutter priority, it's a quick couple of clicks to make the adjustments, and worth the effort. If you're shooting manual, it's a little more effort to decide what to change, but still do-able with stationary subjects. Let us know if these suggestions work for you, or if you come up with a different technique that works better for you. :)

    Good Luck!




    youtube icon png. Hindi youtube icon png
  • Hindi youtube icon png


  • reddog
    04-08 04:19 PM
    All i am asking is the media they know and number of users. I dont know what you talking about.

    Ok, how do we contact the state representative. Through the county representative, then the city, then street?

    We are IV. I believe that is what chandu meant. Core is just a group of people who incidentally reserved the domain name and configured joomla.



    more...

    youtube icon png. flickr, youtube, png icons
  • flickr, youtube, png icons


  • andy garcia
    08-23 02:57 PM
    How many visas are there for India in a year in EB3, EB2 and EB1?


    YEAR **** EB1 ****** EB2 ****** EB3 **** Total(EB)



    2000 *** 2,306 ***** 7,233 ***** 5,360 *** 15,381
    2001 *** 3,543 **** 21,355 **** 16,405 *** 41,720
    2002 *** 2,820 **** 21,310 **** 17,428 *** 41,919
    2003 *** 1,266 ***** 8,536 ****10,680 *** 20,818 :confused:
    2004 *** 2,998 **** 16,262 **** 19,962 *** 39,496
    2005 *** 6,336 **** 16,687 **** 23,399 *** 47,160 :)


    These figures are from this link
    http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/statistics/statistics_1476.html




    youtube icon png. icons Youtube+icon+png
  • icons Youtube+icon+png


  • sachug22
    12-10 02:31 PM
    deleted



    more...

    youtube icon png. Click on the Youtube icon and
  • Click on the Youtube icon and


  • senk1s
    10-25 04:49 PM
    RFE is basically 'looking for proof /more information'

    Wait for that then you'll know what they are looking for

    -and lately 'anything' is very normal :(




    youtube icon png. the email icon png buddy x
  • the email icon png buddy x


  • anurakt
    01-20 10:27 AM
    I have no answer for this, I guess someone in this forum who is a US graduate can help us.



    more...

    youtube icon png. Netvibes 512x512 Icon
  • Netvibes 512x512 Icon


  • mayhemt
    04-29 08:16 PM
    If only their future was clear... they would have a tleast bought a house, if not start a business.
    150 000 * 190 000 = 28 500 000 - Assuming 190K is median home price.
    28.5 billion $ went unused.
    This is just the real estate - not even counting other in-direct purchases, cars, furniture, other related services.

    150 000 * 100 000 * (6%) = 900 000 000 : Assuming 100K is their annual salary, US lost earning 900 million $ in SS contributions.

    May be we should show a factor to US Govt, each unused visa equals to XX unused economy dollars.

    Homes purchases lost : 28 Billion
    Social Security unearned: 900 Million
    Effect of guy yelling "Tuk Yer Job": Priceless.
    (If you watch South Park, you would understand the above...)




    youtube icon png. rockmay Youtube+icon+png
  • rockmay Youtube+icon+png


  • logiclife
    04-15 06:54 PM
    I have been in this situation but my work location changed more than 100miles within the same state. My attorney asked me to start another labor.

    1. If you think that you will move back one the 485 is adjucated, then you dont have to worry. OTherwise, you have file a new labor. Atleast you are safe since your 140 is approved. You can port your PD.

    2. If it is within few miles then it should not affect. Still you have to check with your attorney. Few miles sometimes puts you in different couty or state or even in different country. So the term "Few Miles" is relative one and it is better to check with attorney.

    By making you file for new labor, your attorney has played it too safe. In your case, filing a new labor was not neccesary. Please read below and check with an immigration lawyer for advice. I AM NOT A LAWYER but this advice is based on 2 different lawyers I have talked to regarding my own case where I moved from Phoenix, to Reno after my labor was filed.

    Here is the deal when changing the location while GC is pending:

    1. You can change location during your pending GC. But your job description must not change. Also, you have to move back to the location where your GC was filed, ONLY IF your 485 is processed and approved in less than 180 days from filing (I dont think USCIS will ever be that efficient and process 485 petitions in less than 180 days). That's because your option of AC21 of changing employers and locations (within the same job description, you cant work at a gas station or McDonalds) kicks in after 180 days of filing 485. If your 485 is approved in less than 180 days, then yes, you have to go back to the original location where your Greencard was filed because you dont have the AC21 options of switching employers and locations during your 485 stage ... which is available ONLY AFTER 180 days have passed in the processing of your 485 file.

    So as long as your 485 takes longer than 180 days, you can continue to work at your new location even though you GC and labor was filed at a previous location.

    2. After 180 days of filing 485, you can change employers using your EAD and change locations. No limit. But it has to be the same job description. You cannot start working as a manager if your Greencard was filed for the position of a programmer.




    youtube icon png. vista Youtube+icon+png
  • vista Youtube+icon+png


  • hpandey
    06-02 03:16 PM
    you are right, but isnt that found only when you are travelling outside of the USA? If I am in USA till i get a gc and then add my wife, how will anyone know if she is out of status ?

    As people have said above as soon as you move from H1 to EAD your H1 would be no longer be valid and hence the corresponding H-4 status will no longer be valid and since you cannot file for AOS for your wife now , your wife will be out of status.

    This information will come up in future when you apply for I-485 for your wife.It does not matter if your wife is still in the US or not. She will be out of status if you lose your H1 status ( just like anyone who loses his H1 status the dependent also loses his status ).




    phillyag
    07-20 02:15 PM
    If I have applied for 485 can I still do that ?




    shreekhand
    07-25 12:11 PM
    Some clarifications needed here !

    1.) Data entry is not done by adjudication officers (AO)
    2.) Unless an AO is trained in a particular "production line"
    (I-485, I-765 etc.) they cannot move them around
    3.) Bear in mind AO's have the option to and do work from home too.
    4.) The adjudication rate per past service center reports is
    around 2 or3 cases per hour for I-485


    The assumptions here are all the 50 guys are working only on EB cases no family and other cases, they are not doing any other data entry job like putting 450/ead/ap applications into system, they are not approving any of ead/ap cases. And they are working 8 hours daily. Looking at the general work environment around i bet the productive hrs in 8 hr work day is around 5/6 hrs. So keeping in mind these factors i feel the 80000 is okay number. They certainly need more staff. My 2 cents.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment